
Netmidas Legal Snapshot (Last 120 Days, as of January 1, 2026)
Brazil continues to be one of the most strategically important nearshore markets for remote IT talent in Latin America. In the past 120 days, there have been no new federal statutes that directly regulate freelancers or independent contractors in the IT sector. However, significant judicial developments, digital enforcement reforms, and tax updates have shifted the compliance landscape for foreign companies engaging Brazilian contractors.
The most important ongoing development is the Supreme Federal Court (STF) case on “Pejotização” - Theme 1389, which is expected to establish binding national parameters on the legality and classification of individuals engaged through service-provider entities (Pessoa Jurídica or PJ). A public hearing was held on October 6, 2025, signaling that a final decision could set nationwide precedent and reshape how contractor relationships are evaluated in practice.
At the same time, Brazil’s digital compliance infrastructure, including eSocial and FGTS Digital, is evolving, increasing the operational complexity and cost associated with misclassification events. Although these digital systems apply formally to employees under Brazil’s Labor Code (CLT), they still materially raise risk for contractors when relationships blur into employment-like patterns.
From a nearshore hiring perspective, independent contractor engagement remains legal and viable, but it now requires greater discipline, documentation, and operational clarity.
Brazil has two parallel legal regimes:
Under the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT), an employment relationship is defined by:
When these elements are found, mandatory labor obligations apply, such as FGTS, social security, paid leave, 13th salary, overtime, and other statutory benefits.
Independent contractors, freelancers, and service-provider companies (PJs) operate outside the CLT framework. In the IT sector, PJ contracting is widespread and lawful, with most freelancers opting to incorporate for tax efficiency and commercial flexibility.
However, Brazil’s courts apply substance over form when evaluating relationships. This means that even if a contractor is engaged through a commercial entity, courts may reclassify the engagement as employment based on factual indicators.
Remote and distributed work arrangements can inadvertently create conditions akin to employee relationships. Key factors that Brazilian courts tend to evaluate include:
When these elements are present, the risk of judicial reclassification, even for PJs, increases meaningfully.
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has been considering Theme 1389, a case that will clarify whether labor courts can adjudicate fraud allegations related to civil/commercial service contracts and how misclassification disputes must be handled nationwide. A public hearing was held on October 6, 2025, and although the final ruling is still pending, the direction of the debate suggests increased scrutiny on PJ arrangements.
The effect of this ongoing development includes:
Brazil’s labor and social-security reporting platform, eSocial, implemented updated XML schemas and new validation rules in late November 2025. While eSocial formally applies to employment payroll, any reclassification event for contractors triggers immediate compliance obligations under this framework, increasing operational risk and audit exposure.
Recent ordinances affecting FGTS Digital operations illustrate the broader trend toward centralized and automated enforcement of labor compliance. While some provisions were geographically limited or situational, the trend underscores Brazil’s stronger compliance infrastructure.
In December 2025, the Receita Federal emphasized that:
This affects Brazilian freelancers who relocate abroad as well as foreign companies engaging Brazilian nationals with changing residency status.
Brazil has not banned freelancers, PJs, or independent contractors. However, companies cannot rely on contract formality alone. They must be able to demonstrate genuine commercial independence, absence of subordination, and lack of economic dependence.
The consequences of misclassification go beyond retroactive labor benefits. They now include:
Certain contractor engagement models face elevated scrutiny, including:
Brazil’s discussions around the “right to disconnect” and remote work governance apply directly to employees but may also influence how contractor relationships are assessed. Practices such as constant availability expectations, after-hours communication, and monitoring software can be used as evidence of control and subordination, even for contractors.
Most IT freelancers in Brazil operate as PJs or under Microempreendedor Individual (MEI) structures. Regardless of format:
Remote mobility also increases exposure to:
Periodic review of tax and residency status is essential.
Brazil’s Digital Nomad Visa allows foreign nationals to work remotely from Brazil for foreign employers. While this does not directly apply to Brazilian nationals working as contractors, it reflects Brazil’s broader regulatory engagement with cross-border remote work.
To protect contractor engagements and mitigate risk:
Brazil in 2026 will reward companies that demonstrate compliance maturity, documentation discipline, and contractor-management clarity.
The STF’s decision on Theme 1389 is expected to provide the first binding national standard on contractor classification. Once issued, labor courts will adjust their analysis accordingly, potentially reshaping litigation strategies and compliance expectations across the Brazilian labor ecosystem.
This briefing is a high-level informational summary based on publicly available sources. It is not legal advice. NetMidas and its clients should consult qualified local counsel in Brazil before making legal, tax, or employment decisions.
Mexico continues to offer one of the clearest legal frameworks in Latin America for engaging independent contractors and freelancers. Unlike other jurisdictions where contractor rules are evolving rapidly, Mexican law has maintained a relatively stable distinction between employment relationships governed by the Federal Labor Law (LFT) and independent service arrangements governed by civil or commercial law.
Brazil continues to be one of the most strategically important nearshore markets for remote IT talent in Latin America. In the past 120 days, there have been no new federal statutes that directly regulate freelancers or independent contractors in the IT sector. However, significant judicial developments, digital enforcement reforms, and tax updates have shifted the compliance landscape for foreign companies engaging Brazilian contractors.
Colombia’s Labor Reform 2025 (Ley 2466 de 2025) - enacted June 25, 2025 - significantly modernized the country’s labor framework. Although the reform primarily targets employees, it indirectly affects independent contractors/freelancers, especially those working remotely for foreign companies.

